Sybermoms Parenting Forum - Reply to Topic
General Parenting Need answers to your questions? Don't know where to go for support? Here's your place, we know all the answers and can help you with the most generic of problems.

Thread: clothing sizes Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 
 
 
 
   

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Sybermoms Parenting Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself. Do NOT use an AOL email address.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
04-23-2021 12:56 AM
EddyEd I have never thought about this, haha. That's funny
10-01-2003 05:13 AM
hyperbabbola I never had a problem with sizing. I think Canadian sizing must offer more range in general. We also have 3, then 3x. I haven't quite figured out what 3x equates to in American sizing, but I think it's about 4T. Our 4's are quite big, more "kid sized" than toddler sized.
09-30-2003 03:43 PM
beachbum I think it is a conspiracy to make me lose my mind when I clothe shopping for the girls.
09-30-2003 01:45 PM
Kady Aaaaaactually... Gymboree just came out with a 9-12 in their newborn collection. They still have the 6-12 but added the 9-12 and then it jumps to 12-18.

DS is busting out of the 6-12 (tops especially) but the 12-18 are too big for him. I hate that inbetweenness look.

Oh, and he's only 9 months. He's Mr. Torso Man.
09-30-2003 08:59 AM
Morrigan
09-30-2003 08:53 AM
Caitlynsmom
09-30-2003 08:31 AM
Big Lots Quacker Kids stop growing quite so FAT
09-30-2003 08:30 AM
Morrigan Quite so fats = quite so *fast*
09-30-2003 08:28 AM
Big Lots Quacker Hmmn, interesting.
09-30-2003 08:27 AM
Morrigan At some point, generally around 12 months but sometimes at 18, they just stop putting size ranges on clothes. They give you the largest (average) size the garment is meant for, instead. I think it saves them on label ink.

I've seen several 18 month labels (between 12 month and 24 month / 2T). Presumably kids stop growing quite so fats once they hit 1 yo, and so they don't need to make as many different sizes in between. Same again for the 2yo break.
09-30-2003 08:10 AM
Caitlynsmom I've always wondered the same thing.
09-30-2003 07:54 AM
Big Lots Quacker
clothing sizes

I have been going through some clothes selling them and have noticed this and wondered about it. You have 0-3 mo, 3-6mo 6-9 and then 12 mo. Why is there not a 9-12. What about the kids who are between that range. For that matter then it goes to 2T 3T 4T.
Is there a reason for this?

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome